- Joined
- Dec 15, 2011
- Messages
- 61
- Reaction score
- 1
Im wondering something about Glossybox. Anyone think maybe it is like a franchise restaurant where they bascially rent out their name to someone in each country and they are run totally seperate?
I'm no genius, and deff. don't know much on this, BUT I 1st of all dont think anything was wrong with the site(I didnt experience any problems) and also, what is wrong with a site being in beta? That doesn't mean it is any less secure or that it works worse. Google Chrome was in beta for YEARS /emoticons/[email protected] 2x" width="20" height="20" /> That just means whoever is developing it wants to fix bugs(they can be major bugs us as customers don't notice) My brothr is a web developer which is why I know a bit about this(though, again, not much).Originally Posted by Playedinloops /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I don't understand why they don't have a testing environment website...that should be standard for a business.
Its not about being in beta for me, its about them saying they opened the subs for testing then had to open them for real because someone saw.Originally Posted by Jwls750 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I'm no genius, and deff. don't know much on this, BUT I 1st of all dont think anything was wrong with the site(I didnt experience any problems) and also, what is wrong with a site being in beta? That doesn't mean it is any less secure or that it works worse. Google Chrome was in beta for YEARS /emoticons/[email protected] 2x" width="20" height="20" /> That just means whoever is developing it wants to fix bugs(they can be major bugs us as customers don't notice) My brothr is a web developer which is why I know a bit about this(though, again, not much).
When I spoke to customer service at GlossyBox - the rep were super unprepared (but very nice) and was not aware of the "launch" of the subscriptions- imagine the stress on the reps looking towards the end of their day -calm and peaceful - then bam a bazillion calls about sign ups for subs due to the unintentional "launch" of the site. I hope the reps get some sort of bonuses for yesterday.Originally Posted by Playedinloops /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Its not about being in beta for me, its about them saying they opened the subs for testing then had to open them for real because someone saw.
They should do the testing in a test environment, which should be a separate URL linked to a test version of their database. Testing your system is different than working out your website. This would enable them to test the way it works without having to actually open the subs where the public can see.
Testing is what companies do before they are upgrade their database or website. A website can be out of beta for years, and ready for an upgrade, and that is when testing should happen in a test environment, or when a website is opening.
Exactly! I was a CSR before I got promoted and despite being the first line of contact for customers, I was always the last one to know about what was going on. It sucked so much.Originally Posted by LadyEarth /img/forum/go_quote.gif
When I spoke to customer service at GlossyBox - the rep were super unprepared (but very nice) and was not aware of the "launch" of the subscriptions- imagine the stress on the reps looking towards the end of their day -calm and peaceful - then bam a bazillion calls about sign ups for subs due to the unintentional "launch" of the site. I hope the reps get some sort of bonuses for yesterday.
Originally Posted by feelingrealtan /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I dont understand why this launch isnt more smooth. This isnt their first launch, like My Glam's was. They've launched in so many other countries, why isnt this going more smoothly? Its like they came off as this very experienced and veteran subsciption service but theyre not fully functional for their launch. For $21 and all the hype, I have high expectations (that are based on the standards they set, like making the wait for the launch so long) that are already not being met.
Just fyi, I did not sign up as Im going to see how it all plays out first.
Exactly! They weren't fully ready to launch, and I fully expect to hear LOTS of complaints as people froth at the mouth waiting for their first shipments.Originally Posted by MKCurio /img/forum/go_quote.gif
because they weren't fully ready to launch they were kinda pressured to do so as people we stalking the site while they were testing. My guess is they were going to test this week and launch next week with time to ship by the 26th.
On twitter they did Tweet about the website issues..and try to again.Originally Posted by Angie Tacker /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I am really not sure what the "messy" "bugs" are. The site was slow but likely that was just overburdened servers. Can someone explain these problems?
I'm kind of getting that feeling. They really seem like they have no idea what they're doing.Originally Posted by SarahElizSS /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Im wondering something about Glossybox. Anyone think maybe it is like a franchise restaurant where they bascially rent out their name to someone in each country and they are run totally seperate?
Auto, you should definitely review the terms and conditions...Originally Posted by StellaSunshine /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I signed up today! I'm just going to do the monthly subscription so I can bail if things look bad. Does anyone know if this is an auto renewal or do I need to resubscribe every month?
Just to add to this and shed some light on the problems with the GlossyBox site from what I got out of the conversation with the CS rep - yesterday the site was suppose to be in testing mode - it should not have launched.Originally Posted by LadyEarth /img/forum/go_quote.gif
When I spoke to customer service at GlossyBox - the rep were super unprepared (but very nice) and was not aware of the "launch" of the subscriptions- imagine the stress on the reps looking towards the end of their day -calm and peaceful - then bam a bazillion calls about sign ups for subs due to the unintentional "launch" of the site. I hope the reps get some sort of bonuses for yesterday.
Originally Posted by LadyEarth /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Just to add to this and shed some light on the problems with the GlossyBox site from what I got out of the conversation with the CS rep - yesterday the site was suppose to be in testing mode - it should not have launched.
During testing they either did not use a test url that was private or somehow during private testing it became public. Someone visiting the site found they could subscribe -cue the rush of signs ups due to social media.
The site and CS and Glossybox did not intend to launch yesterday. All bugs and site problems were never worked out due to the site launching ahead of schedule. Once signs ups began to happen GlossyBox responded by saying the site/signups have gone live when really it was live for quite a while.
My worry is that with all the signs up - there may have taken on more subscriptions they can handle.
Originally Posted by LadyEarth /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Just to add to this and shed some light on the problems with the GlossyBox site from what I got out of the conversation with the CS rep - yesterday the site was suppose to be in testing mode - it should not have launched.
During testing they either did not use a test url that was private or somehow during private testing it became public. Someone visiting the site found they could subscribe -cue the rush of signs ups due to social media.
The site and CS and Glossybox did not intend to launch yesterday. All bugs and site problems were never worked out due to the site launching ahead of schedule. Once signs ups began to happen GlossyBox responded by saying the site/signups have gone live when really it was live for quite a while.
My worry is that with all the signs up - there may have taken on more subscriptions they can handle.
I had received an e-mail that it had launched?Originally Posted by LadyEarth /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Just to add to this and shed some light on the problems with the GlossyBox site from what I got out of the conversation with the CS rep - yesterday the site was suppose to be in testing mode - it should not have launched.
During testing they either did not use a test url that was private or somehow during private testing it became public. Someone visiting the site found they could subscribe -cue the rush of signs ups due to social media.
The site and CS and Glossybox did not intend to launch yesterday. All bugs and site problems were never worked out due to the site launching ahead of schedule. Once signs ups began to happen GlossyBox responded by saying the site/signups have gone live when really it was live for quite a while.
My worry is that with all the signs up - there may have taken on more subscriptions they can handle.
Enter your email address to join: