Red Carpet Box

[BeautyGal]

Maybe she bought them for a really low price online somewhere and they came with two names on it. I can't think of a reason she'd put two brand names on them -- it would make it obvious they're fakes.

 

[nelliebelle1197]

Check out the new excuses on Red Carpet Excuses' Facebook page. She has been hospitalized and attending funerals. It wasn't her fault! It was the supplier! OMG!

 

[zadidoll]

Probably is with her claims that it's actual River Island which is better is the fact it's STILL COUNTERFEIT!

 

[Dalisay]

Check out the new excuses on Red Carpet Excuses' Facebook page. She has been hospitalized and attending funerals. It wasn't her fault! It was the supplier! OMG!

I saw that earlier today. Excuses after excuses. It always has something to do with medical issues and her suppliers. Once she's caught in the act, she makes these long post trying to convince everyone to believe that the products are a lot better than they think. Oh the cycle never ends... Circle of lies.

 

[nelliebelle1197]

I just don't get these people who defend her junk. I bet they don't even realize the makeup is so old. Did anyone notice the partner is now a "he"??!!

 

[EmGee]

I think I read somewhere unopened powder shadows are ok for 3 years or 36 months??
But not liquid stuff.

Is there such thing as "fake Chanel samples"?? just curious.

Wonder what is worse Glossybox Canada sending out expired liquid avon eyeshadow from 2005.....or this. or both are bad.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockhoundluna /img/forum/go_quote.gif


2009, well not surprised to hear it considering the way RCB has been! I'm actually also curious about that Chanel sample packet, just can't make out all the letters. BUT if it says "

Precision Rectifiance Intense Eye" and I think it might... the info I'm finding is reviews from 2009. I can't find it on Chanel's site so I don't think it's a current product. How long could eye cream really be good for anyway? Surely not three or four years?.

 

[wvg88]

most big companies probably do not care about this stuff especially from a bunch of people not even purchasing red carpet box and not losing their money on it.... as long as they are making money they are probably fine.  if they cared, they would have all their old products returned or destroyed by the companies they are actually working with and provide some credits to them for new product.  since they do not do this, it should tell all of us that the large companies we all love want their products out far and wide.  they are willing to take risks for profits.  period.

 

[MissLindaJean]

most big companies probably do not care about this stuff especially from a bunch of people not even purchasing red carpet box and not losing their money on it.... as long as they are making money they are probably fine.  if they cared, they would have all their old products returned or destroyed by the companies they are actually working with and provide some credits to them for new product.  since they do not do this, it should tell all of us that the large companies we all love want their products out far and wide.  they are willing to take risks for profits.  period.

Definitely don't agree with this. Some companies will go after others selling counterfeits. It's eating into their profits and that's never good. Paul Mitchell discovered knock off products being sold in salons and went to bat, with the feds stepping in to prosecute the case. MAC sued Target in Australia for selling MAC fakes.

 

[nellswell]

Wow! I'd never heard of this company until now. I clicked on the thread to find out more and will be staying far, FAR away. I'm already "weird"/paranoid about old products, and the idea of somebody putting them in these boxes and selling them is just... *shudder*

Thanks to all who have posted warnings; I hope other potential new customers will read this thread and steer clear!

 

[rockhoundluna]

Originally Posted by zadidoll /img/forum/go_quote.gif

Probably is with her claims that it's actual River Island which is better is the fact it's STILL COUNTERFEIT!

Exactly, I wish so much that River Island will call her out on this. It blew my mind when she posted, "here's the link to where the bag is really from!" and put the REAL River Island site....omg, craziness. As if people aren't smart enough to see the logo is all wrong. Hopefully River Island will take notice of that tweet you sent them!

 

[nelliebelle1197]

That is absolutely wrong. Most big companies fight hard to preserve their trademarks and brand reputation. They do sell their old stock, but to places that sell discontinued items or places like Marshall's.But people who buy from these places KNOW what they are buying."Patty"'s customers are being totally misled ON PURPOSE. You are always really desperate to justify what she does, aren't you?

And by the way, Target got in trouble with philosophy for distributing without permission after buying from a third party here in the US three years ago. Calling her bags "sponsored" is misrepresenting and implying a distribution relationship that does not exist.

Originally Posted by wvg88 /img/forum/go_quote.gif

most big companies probably do not care about this stuff especially from a bunch of people not even purchasing red carpet box and not losing their money on it.... as long as they are making money they are probably fine.  if they cared, they would have all their old products returned or destroyed by the companies they are actually working with and provide some credits to them for new product.  since they do not do this, it should tell all of us that the large companies we all love want their products out far and wide.  they are willing to take risks for profits.  period.

 

[nelliebelle1197]

Hey! Twitter! That is what someone ought to do. I have emailed a number of her "sponsors", but no one has answered- I can't seem to track the right people- can someone who knows how to use Twitter shoot this over to Elizabeth Arden, Pixi, Jane and River Island?

Originally Posted by rockhoundluna /img/forum/go_quote.gif

Exactly, I wish so much that River Island will call her out on this. It blew my mind when she posted, "here's the link to where the bag is really from!" and put the REAL River Island site....omg, craziness. As if people aren't smart enough to see the logo is all wrong. Hopefully River Island will take notice of that tweet you sent them!

 

[BlingAndbeautyS]

WOW! Thanks for the heads up! I've read this entire thread from start to the latest post and am astonished at horrible RCB is! To think it almost became my very first sub box mainly because of the purses/bags! .. Horrible .. just horrible.
 

 

[Hellocat4]

Just received a reply from river island. I probably should have sent them a link, but nonetheless, here is their response: Thank you for your recent email, We would like to thank you for bringing this matter to our attention, We will keep a look out on our face book page for this person selling the items. We would also advise that river island will only sell items from our website and store. If we can be of any further assistant please do not hesitate to contact us. Kind Regards, Andrea Trueman The Customer Service Team River Island Clothing Co Ltd. Registered Address: Chelsea House, West Gate London W5 1DR

 

[meaganola]

Originally Posted by Hellocat4 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Just received a reply from river island. I probably hold have sent them a link, but nonetheless, here is their response:

Thank you for your recent email,

We would like to thank you for bringing this matter to our attention,

We will keep a look out on our face book page for this person selling the items.

We would also advise that river island will only sell items from our website and store.

If we can be of any further assistant please do not hesitate to contact us.

Kind Regards,

Andrea Trueman

The Customer Service Team

River Island Clothing Co Ltd.

Registered Address: Chelsea House,

West Gate London W5 1DR

I'm adding bold/underline emphasis here because I can imagine that this could get down to what the definition of "is" is:  She spends a *lot* of time stating that the purses and sunglasses are "gifts," so I can see how she will use that as a defense that she's not *selling* the purses and sunglasses, legit or not.

 

[nellswell]

Sorry I'm a bit behind since I just discovered this thread yesterday. I've caught up with most of the posts by now. I have to admit I find the whole thing intriguing because I've had some personal not-so-pleasant (ongoing) experiences with a malignant narcissist. From what I've seen of this woman's replies -- and especially her behavior on Ripoff Report -- I VERY much agree that she comes across as somebody with narcissistic personality disorder. They do not take well to criticism, even constructive criticism. I don't doubt she takes every negative comment about her silly expired products as a personal "attack." EVERYTHING that isn't praise/sympathy to a narcissist is an "attack." Her "counter attacks" on Zadidoll/Dior (on the Ripoff Report page) is also classic narcissistic response... and no doubt because she feels especially threatened by Zadidoll/Dior/MUT. This very thread is a threat to her carefully constructed persona ("model", "law student", supermom, whatever).

It's actually very stressful and frustrating (to say the least) and even a bit scary to deal with this type of person. Reading this thread is bringing back some very unpleasant memories, and as someone who's been in a similar boat to Zadidoll/Dior (having my name and personal info spread around with ridiculous accusations because I dared express an opinion about a product) I complete empathize with them. I would NEVER do business with this Patricia after reading that Ripoff Report and all her other BS (not to mention the expired makeup -- yuck!).

Personally, with the 7 million illnesses she claims to have, I wouldn't be surprised if she is/was involved in some kind of online Munchausen scam. I could be wrong and probably shouldn't be speculating so much anyhow...

 

[BlingAndbeautyS]

Sounds like her husband's "business" is pretty shady too?

 

[Dakota750]

Originally Posted by lunadust /img/forum/go_quote.gif

I thoroughly enjoy the fact it says "upscale" on that business card.

Also the fact that it's one of the free business card templates on vistaprint, lol. 

http://www.vistaprint.com/vp/ns/studio3.aspx?pf_id=088&combo_id=120585&combo=469067.82.59.479710%7c479710%7c137%7c0&uei=124206&ag=true&ssc=1&filter=9%3a10013%7c%7c1%2c4%3a10003%7c%7c1%2c3%3a10001%7c%7c1&xnav=previews&xnid=image&rd=2&ref=1&referer=http%3a%2f%2fwww.vistaprint.com%2fgallery.aspx%3fpg%3d1

 

[zadidoll]

That template is also available at Staples & I believe as well as OfficeMax and OfficeDepot. It's a standard template.

 

[bluelion]

I'm seeing this now: "No one has been offered a full refund. That is not our policy. We offered full refunded shipping only for this bag, not a refund. We offered replacement of damaged or defective items only, as per our policy RCB"

Yeah, except someone was offered a refund...I wonder if those posts will be deleted now.

"Just put the envelope back together with all tags attached and return the package in the same envelope with your new label. Upon receipt we will refund your purchase and your shipping costs."

"In order to get a refund via PayPal you must return the entire package. That is standard policy with any company."

"Please return everything and we will reimburse your shipping also."