Originally Posted by
Cool Kitten PLEASE READ WHAT I'M WRITING AND COMPREHEND THIS SO I CAN FINALLY STOP REPEATING MYSELF!!!!!Partial abortions ARE ILLEGAL unless the mother will die if she carries to term or the baby is severely deformed. YOU CANNOT WALK INTO THE ABORTION CLINIC WHEN 6 MONTHS PREGNANT AND ASK FOR ONE!!!!!
Again, PARTIAL ABORTIONS ARE ILLEGAL IN US! No one here is advocating them as a method of birth control. If your child is missing limbs but is otherwise healthy then by all means chose to carry him to term. But what if the child has severe brain damage and has no chances of surviving past delivery? Are you still going to chose to continue the pregnancy and deliver a stillborn baby?
I know that, but I thought you were referring to any deformities in the baby, not just deformities so severe that the baby would probably not live past birth. Sorry
However I don't think I could ever bring myself to kill an unborn baby when it still had a heartbeat like charish said (post #62) but I can certainly understand why someone would want a partial-birth abortion in such a case. A tough decision for everyone involved, I think...
Originally Posted by
dixiewolf An earlier post said someone knew a lady who had her period during her pregnancy, I know someone also who never missed a period during her whole pregnancy, she didnt know until the baby was almost born, I dont think she would have aborted it anyways though, but she didnt even get big. My psych professor told us another story of a women who never knew she was pregnant -- she had her period all 9 months and only gained about 10 lbs. When she went into labor she thought it was just bad cramps and went to the ER and came home with a baby! (The professor was saying that it's enough of an adjustment when you have 7-8 months to plan for a baby, imagine having only a few hours!) So maybe it happens more often than I thought!
Originally Posted by
dixiewolf If you want to get all religious, isnt taking the pill wrong to very religious believers? I'm not trying to start a new discussion here, but just to answer the question .... The Catholic's church official position is that all birth control (including condoms, etc) is wrong because it interferes with God's will for you to have children. (They still allow natural family planning though.) But I think that's because they believe the main purpose of marriage is for procreation. But I'm not Catholic so someone correct me if I'm wrong
However, a few conservative non-Catholics (like myself) believe that the pill is wrong for other reasons. While the main mechanism of the pill (or any hormonal bc including the patch or the shot) is to prevent ovulation, we all know that abstinance is the only 100% effective method of bc
So on the rare occasions that a women does ovulate on the pill, the pill also acts as a spermicide (by thickening the mucus, I think) and thins the lining of the uterus to help prevent the implantation of a fertlized egg. Well, if you believe that life begins at conception (fertilization), then aborting a fertilized egg is killing a life. However I know this is a rather extreme view -- I have many pro-life Christian friends and family who still take the pill, either not knowing about the implantation issue, or not caring since women naturally abort fertilized eggs sometimes. (For the record, hubby and I see nothing wrong with barrier methods since that is preventing fertilization and a life is never created.)
So that was just to clarify, not to start a new debate on birth control, no one take offense please