- Joined
- Mar 30, 2006
- Messages
- 544
- Reaction score
- 0
i think parental consent should be considered incidental at best. idon't think they should give them to eleven year olds. i think it;'s brilliant and they should be free or low cost to high school students. I don't give a damn what parents think or what religion they are, sticking ones head in the sand is stupid and denial. i thought masturbation should be discussed in schools perhaps and was pissed when a high government official was fired over it, they are like that in other countries and their countries aren't falling apart at the seams. geez louise.
Originally Posted by Nox /img/forum/go_quote.gif Ugh! I am actually disgusted. Disgusted that a measure like that had to be taken in the first place. Carolyn, you raised an interesting point. Why the heck is it, that they go and target the girls (babies is what they are!) to put "control" on themselves, when really, the boys might need to be addressed even more in this picture. I have a feeling the boys impregnating these baby girls are a bit older... maybe even in high school. Boys 11 years of age are not quite equipped for that sort of handiwork. I feel it is the beginnings of predatory behavior, and it needs to be nipped in the bud. that's brilliant and explains why i thought birth control for the young was practical yet gave me the heebie jeebies. oh and i knew a girl who lost her virginity to her boyfriend at eleven, and her boyfriend was sixteen, she said it was "no big deal" and i gave her big eyes and she said "i looked like this (she gestures over her body) "by the time I was eleven. he didn't know any different and i lied about my age at first to be with him anyhow."
she was five foot five and a c cup. go figure! had her menarche at nine. but the VAST majority of the age stated are no where near as developed as she was, and children need to let their minds catch up to their bodies if they develop quickly. i have heard of boys getting girls pregnant as young as twelve or thirteen. the boy was a 12 or 13 year old father, I mean.
Originally Posted by Nox /img/forum/go_quote.gif Ugh! I am actually disgusted. Disgusted that a measure like that had to be taken in the first place. Carolyn, you raised an interesting point. Why the heck is it, that they go and target the girls (babies is what they are!) to put "control" on themselves, when really, the boys might need to be addressed even more in this picture. I have a feeling the boys impregnating these baby girls are a bit older... maybe even in high school. Boys 11 years of age are not quite equipped for that sort of handiwork. I feel it is the beginnings of predatory behavior, and it needs to be nipped in the bud. that's brilliant and explains why i thought birth control for the young was practical yet gave me the heebie jeebies. oh and i knew a girl who lost her virginity to her boyfriend at eleven, and her boyfriend was sixteen, she said it was "no big deal" and i gave her big eyes and she said "i looked like this (she gestures over her body) "by the time I was eleven. he didn't know any different and i lied about my age at first to be with him anyhow."
she was five foot five and a c cup. go figure! had her menarche at nine. but the VAST majority of the age stated are no where near as developed as she was, and children need to let their minds catch up to their bodies if they develop quickly. i have heard of boys getting girls pregnant as young as twelve or thirteen. the boy was a 12 or 13 year old father, I mean.