Originally Posted by
Annia /img/forum/go_quote.gif The "world"
There are people we should be paying a lot more attention to and recognizing for true greatness.
Pamela Anderson is only even known because her job happens to put her image in front of all of us on a regular basis. More exposure than the average person will of course bring fans on.
Being a sex symbol does not require one to be perfect. There are many women whom have a masculine body or face, and are still a sex symbol; there's nothing wrong with that. Being hyper-feminine is not negative, nor is being hyper-masculine, or in between.
I know it's hard to picture a female having a masculine body because people tend to have negative thoughts about it or project an image of a real man, and are not as accepting. Now, if I told you I had a masculine nasoglabellar, you'd think I look super manly just by saying it was masculine. But no, it's just masculine and it doesn't mean I look like a real man.
Okay hopefully this will be my last time commenting to you about this. I don't think being a sex symbol requires one to be perfect, but I really don't think a female sex symbol like Pam (arguably the biggest sex symbol of all-time) who made a career just from her beauty/body could have a masculine figure. If you think this is masculine, I don't know what to tell you. Her arms are toned, but not too buff. She obviously is very well-endowed.
She doesn't have big hips, but she does have some hips. Her body isn't a straight up & down type of body. Everyone knows she's got beautiful, great legs, which are long for her frame. The good majority of women can only dream of having bodies this "masculine". If you don't find Pam's body type perfect/not even attractive, that's your own opinion/preference & I respect that. I guess tons & tons of men in the world drool over a woman with a masculine body.