Nah, Milly is a legit brand:
/emoticons/[email protected] 2x" width="20" height="20" />
YOu could have returned the Neiman box to the store. My friend did that. They gladly took it back and issued a store credit even though the box was purchased from popsugar. I feel personally if I buy a box and I don't like it that is what I signed up for the mystery. I have gifted to people many things I didn't want from boxes . I think its awesome to have a pile of gifts waiting when I need one. I didn't sign up for this box due to no spoiler. I figured and was right that if there was no spoiler maybe there was nothing they felt was spectacular.
yeah, i wouldn't do that. it's my mistake for buying - no reason to put in on NM. and I have TONS of gifts - trust me, too many. this $200 price point (and deception around value) is what isn't sticking well. And as I mentioned, I am all for mystery boxes. Again, my mistake for falling for it. I am keeping it (and not going through such backdoor tactics). But this summer box isn't going to be something that I will immediately jump at (as I have for all the other ones over the past 2.5 years).
It was actually a customer service rep from popsugar who emailed my friend when she asked if they would take returns who said she could bring it back to neimans. Nothing sneaky done she is a very honest person
Yes, that's what I meant. I really like Milly's designs, but with no nail polish or products like that in their line, that raises a red flag for me in terms of quality control.Nah, Milly is a legit brand:
http://www.milly.com/about/
I'm thinking that maybe they have never done nail polish before and we are their test market?
Edit: Oh, I see what you mean, you are saying it's cheapo nail polish with a Milly logo. That I can't be sure about
interesting - they didnt offer that to everyone who inquired. I still wouldn't leave it on them (and don't have NM in the area so would have to mail anyways). regardless, it is on me for taking the risk. just wish PS would be more upfront about sales and pricing and not send old inventory for "must have" boxes.
This reasoning makes me wonder if disputing the charge will be successful - I think the box was not at all what it was made out to be. Nevermind that the value isn't as promised.
Your right, the reason everyone is upset was the price and all the oddities around all the items. I mean all you have to do is search those earrings and they come up all over different shops at $295! I think people could make a case for breach of contract. They advertised a $600 value and the earring snafu is real and there is no amount of backpeddling they can do that changes the fact that those earrings are all over the internet for $295. The only thing I am hung up is that nail polish and its shady origins!!
is anyone else seeing that 395 price? when I look it up it is still 295. http://maiyet.com/shop/poison-dart-stud-earrings--gold they changed it on lyst? but not on their own website?
WOW! the website changed it back. Wonder if they have been getting a lot of slack for changing it in the first place. EEK. PR nightmare for both companies. It's kind of false advertising to go and change it like it. Man, wouldn't want to be in either of their shoes right now. I'm just a sucker who threw $200 out. but that impacts their brands. (wanting to sit back and eat popcorn and watch this unfold)...
Me too!! I saw that changed it back too! I was wondering if I had just used my old link from yesterday. Should we factor entertainment value into the box value?!?
