Article: Most Wrinkle Creams Don't Work

Makeuptalk.com forums

Help Support Makeuptalk.com forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Messages
5,046
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

Here's another story about this week's hot topic.

Study: Most Wrinkle Creams Don't Work

Daily Sunscreen Prevents Wrinkles Better, Consumer Reports Says

By Salynn Boyles

WebMD Medical News

Reviewed By Louise Chang, MD

on Thursday, December 14, 2006

Dec. 14, 2006 -- You can pay more than $100 an ounce for a wrinkle cream that promises to erase the years from your face, but spending a few bucks on a good sunscreen is probably a better investment, new research shows.

Those "breakthrough" anti-wrinkle creams now dominating department store cosmetics counters don't really work all that well, shows a Consumer Reports investigation that compares wrinkle creams. And neither do their less pricey drugstore counterparts.

Investigators found no correlation between price and effectiveness in the wrinkle creams they tested. One of the cheapest -- Olay Regenerist -- performed slightly better than the rest.

But none of the tested brands produced dramatic results in terms of reducing wrinkles.

"The fact is that using these products isn't going to make you look like the models in their ads, unless you are 27-years-old and have no wrinkles to begin with," says Nancy Metcalf, a senior projects editor at Consumer Reports.

Study Compares Wrinkle Creams

Americans now spend more than $1 billion a year on antiaging skin products, but most have no idea if there is any scientific basis for claims the products make.

In their first-ever investigation to compare wrinkle creams, Consumer Reports investigators tested nine products, ranging in price from $38 to $335.

Light-skinned women between the ages of 30 and 70 used the creams as recommended by the manufacturers on one side of their face for 12 weeks, while using a moisturizer with sunscreen on the other side.

Each cream was tested by at least 17 women.

An optical device designed to measure minute changes in wrinkle depth and skin roughness was used to evaluate the creams' effectiveness.

Photos were also taken of the crow's feet area of the women's faces before, during, and immediately after participation in the study.

Finally, study participants were evaluated by specially trained technicians, as well as being asked about their satisfaction with the face cream they used.

The investigation found only slight improvements overall in wrinkles for any of the tested products.

But each product performed better for some women than for others.

At $57 for the cream, lotion, or serum, Olay Regenerist was the top performing product, followed by Lancome Paris Renergie, at $176, and RoC Retin-Ox+, at $135.

One of the worst performing products, La Prairie Cellular, was also one of the most expensive, at $335 for an ounce of day cream and 1.7 ounces of night cream.

Active Ingredient Didn't Matter

Investigators found little relationship between the active ingredients in the products and their overall performance.

That surprises Florida dermatologist Susan Weinkle, MD, who tells WebMD that the active ingredient in a wrinkle cream is the most important factor in how it works.

Weinkle is an assistant clinical professor of dermatology at the University of South Florida and a spokesperson for the American Academy of Dermatology.

She says products that contain the vitamin A derivative retinol do seem to have some effect on existing wrinkles. Retinol-based products are weaker versions of the prescription wrinkle cream Retin-A.

However, both the poorest performer in the Consumer Reports test, RoC Retinol Correxion Deep Wrinkle, and one of the best performers, RoC Retin-Ox, have retinol as their active ingredient.

Weinkle says antioxidant-based products, like those containing vitamin C, green tea, or copper, may help prevent wrinkles, but they won't banish those that already exist.

For existing wrinkles, products containing hexapeptides or pentapeptides as their active ingredient may help, she says.

Olay Regenerist is a pentapeptide-based product, but so was one of the poorer performers in the test, StriVectin-SD.

Weinkle agrees that price has little to do with effectiveness when it comes to antiaging skin products.

"Just because you pay more doesn't mean you are getting more," she says. "You really have to look at the ingredients."

She adds that wearing a sunscreen every day will do more to prevent new wrinkles than any face cream on the market.

"Wrinkling comes from ultraviolet light, so you can use expensive wrinkle creams until the cows come home," Weinkle says. "But they aren't going to do much good if you don't protect your face from sun damage."

SOURCES: Consumer Reports, January 2007. Nancy Metcalf, senior projects editor, Consumer Reports. Susan Weinkle, MD, assistant clinical professor of dermatology, University of South Florida; spokesperson, American Academy of Dermatology.

© 2006 WebMD Inc. All rights reserved.

 
i rather save my money and see a surgeon when that time comes.. i dont think creams can reverse ageing

 
Very interesting! Good thing I don't have to worry about wrinkle creams just yet, and I have a pretty aggressive anti-aging regimen, so hopefully I'll never have to. Yay for sunscreen!

 
Hi,

The problem is, that the percentages of what they actually did was extremely low. Olay's product (Lancome came in second) was the best of the bunch, but its percentages were less than 15%.

 
wow, who would pay over $300 for a cream, I'd get Botox insead.

Thank you for the article!

 
I find this very interesting. However, I'm still bothered by the fact that they only tested 9 products. There are literally hundreds of anti aging products out there. Why such a small sampling??

 
wow, i kinda already knew that. that really sucks, we should all sue for false advertisement and get our money back that we've wasted.(save up for the dr.) the only damage i have is from sun. i hate the sun and love it at the same time. thanks for the info.

 
I am 42 and I never use moisturizers. My foundation and concealor has adequate spf. I have always believed that moisturizers are a waste of money, so I am thrilled that this report has come out.

And I have healthy skin with no wrinkles.

 
Thanks for posting the article Leza! Luckily, I already use an spf 15 eye cream and a moisturizer. Gotta keep using them! :) /emoticons/[email protected] 2x" width="20" height="20" />

 
Thanks Leza, interesting article!

I'd rather prevent and slow down the aging process instead of buying/spending $$$ just stay young! We all going get old and wrinkles anyway, so embrace it lol.

 
thank you!!

gonna eat loads of antioxidant food! and i will wear sun screen everday!!

and mb buy olay! (I got a sample bottole :p /emoticons/[email protected] 2x" width="20" height="20" />)

 
as long as you eat antioxidants on a regular basis it can have a pretty good effect, but just putting antioxidants on your face or beginning to eat it for a few months wont do a damn thing

 
ty sheil :) /emoticons/[email protected] 2x" width="20" height="20" />

I do eat alot of veg, fruits, yogurt. im a health conscience freak! but now i know how beneficial it is to ones overall wellbeing!!

the best makeup is the food u eat

 
It is my understanding that fine lines may be helped some by creams and lotions that plump up the outer layers of the skin. Unfortunately, deep wrinkles do not involve just the top layers. A lot of whether you will get wrinkles comes from your genetics, sun exposure, and smoking. If your parents had smooth unlined skin then you will probably have the same as they did. If your parents are wrinkle city, then I sincerely doubt that any amount of cream, lotion, etc. will make a big difference.

What you can control is sun exposure. I live in Florida and constantly see these (apparently) old women who are as brown as a nut and have skin that looks like well worn shoe leather. I also see a lot of tourists from England and northern areas that have lovely smooth skin even though they are well past 50. This is the best demonstration I have ever seen for using sun block. Unfortunately, studies show that much of the sun damage is done in childhood. So unless your mother slathered you up, against your prostests, the best you can do at this point is try to prevent further damage.

As far as smoking goes, it will eventually cause those verticle lines around your lips and destroy your skin from the inside out. I won't go in to the other dangers of smoking. Let me just say that end stage lung cancer is not a pretty site and if you don't smoke, don't start. If you do smoke quit or keep trying to quit. I smoke and I'm on my 5th attempt to quit. And yes, I have the lip lines, crows feet, etc.

 
I have never tried Olay Regenerist, but I love Avon's Anew line and it is rather inexpensive in comparison to other creams. I really never used moisturizers on my face until about 5 years ago ( I am 50 now) because I always had combination skin and did not have the need. I faithfully use sunscreen on my face in the summer as I am always outdoors and I can say that I have just a few lines around my eyes. But from what I have read, 80% of skin damgae occurs before age 20 and the results of the damage appear about 30 years later. So maybe the best advice is to stay out of the sun or make sure you use sunscreen faithfully to avoid abundance of problems later.

 
Ladies,

If you want some great, proven, researched info on skin care (the hype and the truth) check out Paula Begoun's website (Paula Begoun - The Cosmetics Cop - Paula's Choice). She tells it like it is.

To date, the only "cream" FDA approved for the reduction of fine lines, wrinkles, and skin discoloration due to aging is Tretinoin/Retin-A. That, adequate sleep, and sunscreen, sunscreen, sunscreen is the only way to go!

 

Latest posts

Back
Top